B Argumentum ad Verecundiam
Arguing that a claim is true simply because an authority says so.
Name the broken argument, and reason breathes again.
Arguing that a claim is true simply because an authority says so.
Using the conclusion itself as a hidden premise in the argument.
Assuming that because one event followed another, the first caused the second.
Asking a question that contains an unjustified assumption.
Presenting two sides as equally valid when the evidence is not equal.
Smuggling an unsupported assumption into a claim as if it were established.
Building an argument on a premise that is not true.
Claiming something is true because it matches a chosen definition.
Shifting the meaning of a key term mid-argument.
Treating two things as equal despite meaningful differences.
Claiming a first step will inevitably lead to extreme outcomes.
Presenting limited options when more possibilities exist.
Selecting only evidence that supports a position while ignoring contrary evidence.
Using emotion in place of relevant evidence and reasoning.
Rejecting valid argumentation because the speaker lacks favored credentials.
Citing an authority figure outside their area of expertise.
Assuming a claim is false solely because an argument for it is fallacious.
Introducing irrelevant information to distract from the main issue.
Declaring a claim false because it seems hard to imagine.